|
Appeal No. VA94/2/009
AN BINSE LUACHÁLA
VALUATION TRIBUNAL
AN tACHT LUACHÁLA, 1988
VALUATION ACT, 1988
Autozero Limited APPELLANT
and
Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT
RE: Cold Stores and Land at Map Ref: 6C, Townland:
Ballyboggin South,
Ward: Cabra West, County Borough of Dublin
Quantum - Coldstores, Market conditions
B E F O R E
Henry Abbott S.C. Chairman
Mary Devins Solicitor
Patrick Riney F.R.I.C.S. M.I.A.V.I.
JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL
ISSUED ON THE 4TH DAY OF MAY, 1995
By Notice of Appeal dated the 14th day of July, 1994 the appellant appealed
against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a
rateable valuation of £1,850 on the above described hereditament.
The grounds of appeal as set out in the Notice of Appeal are that "the
rateable valuation is excessive and inequitable when the rental value
as of the operative date (i.e. November, 1988) is taken into consideration".
The Property:
The property comprises a cold storage complex fronting onto Broombridge
Road and adjacent to the Dublin Industrial Estate. The property comprises
a large purpose built cold store of 92,655 square feet on a site of seven
and three-quarter acres. The cold stores are used to store commercial
frozen goods and Intervention meat and butter. The cold stores are kept
at a temperature of 24 degrees by using off-peek electricity during night
hours. There are five blast freezers which freeze the fresh produce to
approximately -30/-35 degrees prior to storage.
The cold stores are high-rise at c.30 feet and are serviced by a single
storey office block for administration. The cold rooms are suspended from
the roof of the structure except for cold room number 3 which is a special
PVC coated insulated panel within the frame work of the cold store. All
the cold stores were upgraded in 1985 with the use of "fenox"
insulation panels and external white plastical cladding on their facades.
The floors are constructed of insulated reinforced concrete to prevent
"frost heave", and the lower riding walls are of reinforced
concrete to approximately 3 foot and support the white plastical cladding
in the walls.
There is a concrete surfaced yard measuring 45 metres x 35 metres near
the main entrance gate used for storage and parking of commercial vehicles.
Written Submissions:
A written submission was received on the 18th October, 1994 from Mr. Tadhg
Donnelly of Brian Bagnall & Associates on behalf of the appellant.
In the written submission, Mr. Donnelly described the premises and set
out the accommodation areas that had been agreed with the Valuation Office
as follows:-
Cold Stores 59,635 sq.ft.
Canopy 12,512 sq.ft.
Switch Room/Compressor House 1,949 sq.ft.
Blast Freezer 8,670 sq.ft.
Chill Room 506 sq.ft.
Works Offices 1,134 sq.ft.
Main Offices 4,107 sq.ft.
Security Office 144 sq.ft.
Store 372 sq.ft.
Horse Power 900
Mr. Donnelly said that in calculating the rateable valuation he had given
consideration to the sale price of Autozero, Tallaght and of the adjacent
cold store on Bannow Road. He set out details of the background to the
cold storage business in Ireland and concluded by saying that, rateable
valuations should be calculated with regard to the prices achieved in
the market place when these properties are being transferred from one
owner to another.
A written submission was received on the 11th October, 1994 from Mr.
Patrick Kyne, B.E., Grad Dip.P & D.Econ. a Valuer with 9 years experience
in the Valuation Office on behalf of the respondent. In his written submission,
Mr. Kyne set out the valuation history and description of the premises.
He said that all services were attached to the property. He said that
the buildings were in good condition and that the level of construction
was of a standard cold store being much above that normally associated
within an ordinary industrial unit. Mr. Kyne set out his estimate of the
net annual value and rateable valuation on the subject premises as follows:-
Estimated N.A.V.:-
Offices: 5,380 sq.ft. @ £3.00 p.s.f. = £ 16,140
Cold Stores: 59,635 sq.ft. @ £3.60 p.s.f. = £214,686
Blast Freezers: 9,170 sq.ft. @ £2.50 p.s.f. = £ 22,925
Loading Bays: 11,130 sq.ft. @ £2.00 p.s.f. = £ 22,260
Ancillary Buildings: 7,340 sq.ft. @ £1.50 p.s.f. = £ 11,010
Hp: 900 @ 0.5p /hp = £ 7,142
Total £294,163
R.V. = 0.63% of N.A.V. = £1,853 Say = £1,850
Concluding, Mr. Kyne said that the agent had made no case at First Appeal
stage to support his estimate of a rate per square foot at £3.15.
He said that a large differentiation should be made (at least 50%) for
the type of finish and construction associated with cold stores. He also
said that the situation in relation to Intervention beef storage payment
at the valuation date was that it had steadily increased for the subject
property between 1989 and 1993 whereas the valuation had remained static.
Mr. Kyne offered a number of comparisons and these are tabulated as follows:-
| Area of Cold Stores / sq.ft. |
Eaves Height - ft. |
Rent per sq.ft. |
N.A.V. |
R.V. |
|
| Subject Property - VA94/2/009 |
59,635 |
30ft |
£3.60 |
£293,650 |
£1,850 |
|
Autozero Limited, Tallaght VA94/2/008
|
129,410
(112,283, 17,127)
|
30ft
45ft
|
£3.75
£4.00
|
£611,000 |
£3,850 |
| Eir Freeze Limited VA88/0/189 |
45,093 |
30ft |
£3.80 |
£240,000 |
£1,500 |
| Irish Cold Stores |
38,530 |
30ft |
£3.30 |
£144,500 |
£910.00 |
| Q.K. Cold Stores - Part (a) |
112,860 |
30ft |
£3.60 |
£452,000 |
£2,260 |
| Q.K. Cold Stores - Part (b) |
43,626 |
30ft |
£4.00 |
£186,000 |
£930.00 |
| Q.K. Cold Stores - Part (c) |
57,827 |
30ft |
£3.80 |
£220,000 |
£1,100 |
| Q.K. Cold Stores - Totals (a)(b)(c) |
214,313 |
30ft |
£3.74 |
£858,000 |
£4,290 |
Oral Hearing:
The oral hearing took place on Wednesday 26th October, 1994 in Dublin.
Mr. Tadhg Donnelly of Brian Bagnall & Associates represented the appellant.
Mr. Patrick F. Berkery and Mr. Patrick Kyne represented the respondent.
The valuation of the appellant was primarily argued along the lines that
the demand for cold storage space has been substantially reducing over
recent years and is likely to be 60% less again in 1995. The respondent
stated that in their opinion, the rateable valuation of £3,850,
which had been agreed previously with Lisney & Son in 1984 at First
Appeal, was fair and reasonable. He was also of the opinion that a rate
of £3.00 per square foot, applied by the agent for the appellant,
for the cold stores was too low, when account was taken of the height,
level, finish and cost of construction of cold stores and also when account
was taken of the rates of £3.80 to £4.00 per square foot applied
by the Commissioner to comparable cold stores, of which details were included
in his submission. The appellant argued that due consideration would have
to be given to the substantial reduction occurring in the demand for cold
storage space and also made the point that high rise specialised buildings
could cost a considerable amount of money to convert back to warehouse
use.
Mr. Cyril Houlihan, Financial Controller for Autozero Limited gave a
detailed description of their business.
(1) Cold Stores are specialised buildings mostly built over the last 4/5
years.
(2) The overall capacity is about 11,700 tons.
(3) The buildings cannot be easily converted.
Mr. Clive Bagnell of Autozero Limited, also stated:-
(1) Cold Storage facilities were now operating at approximately 45% capacity.
(2) The policy of the EC is to finish Intervention as soon as possible.
(3) There has been a 40% reduction in capacity over the last few years.
Mr. Berkery pointed out that the valuation date in this case was October/November,
1993 and that in his opinion, at this time, cold storage intervention
was still operating at a high level. The case was adjourned until 18th
January, 1995 when both appellant and respondent attended the re-convened
hearing at the Valuation Tribunal in Dublin.
Mr. Donnelly for the appellant informed the Tribunal that they had been
able to lodge an appeal against the revised valuation as published by
the Commissioner of Valuation around 10th November, 1994. It was agreed
therefore that the substantive issue of Intervention would be dealt with
in the appeal against the 1994 revision. Mr. Donnelly indicated that Comparison
No. 2 of the respondents submission implied that c.£3.00 per square
foot would be reasonable for the subject properties.
Determination:
The Tribunal have considered the varying approaches and detailed comparisons
submitted by both appellant and respondent and have also given due consideration
to the substantial reductions in Intervention Subsidies that are occurring
over the last year and will most likely continue to reduce in future years.
However, having considered all the evidence and all of the comparison
details and in particular the fact that this appeal relates to October/November
1993, the Tribunal considers that the rateable valuation should be £1,815
and so determines.
|