|
Appeal No. VA08/3/024
AN BINSE LUACHÁLA Bernie Moran APPELLANT RE: Property No. 2192206, Crèche at Lot No. 14C/1, Cashelshanaghan, Castlewray, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal B E F O R E JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL By Notice of Appeal dated the 27th day of July, 2008 the appellant appealed against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a valuation of €120.00 on the above described relevant property. The Grounds of Appeal are set out in the Notice of Appeal and pages attached thereto, copies of which are at Appendix 1 to this judgment. The appeal proceeded by way of an oral hearing which took place in the Radisson Hotel, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal on the 6th day of November 2008. Ms. Bernie Moran, the appellant, represented herself. Ms. Catriona Patton, Manager of the appellant business, also attended. Mr. Tomás Cassidy, BSc Property Management & Valuation Surveying, a District Valuer in the Valuation Office, represented the respondent. At the oral hearing both parties, having taken the oath, adopted their précis as being their evidence-in-chief. The Property Concerned Floor area Tenure Appellant’s Case The building is totally self-contained and cost in the region €800,000. It has a lift but this was never commissioned as it would require an extra phone line and, therefore, extra cost. The rates are €8,500 yearly and the wages €150,000 yearly. Ms. Moran felt that the gross floor area used for the determination of the NAV of the property is excessive because it does not take into consideration the large area which contributes nothing to the core activity carried out on the premises. Significant segments of the building form part of the circulation area, corridors, toilets, etc. The dormer style construction of the first floor level is not ideal for income generating and is used only part time after school hours. The crèche is purpose built, adjacent to a working farm and not suitable for adaptation by any other commercial venture. It has had to be subsidised since opening and that trend is continuing with the number of children not exceeding 30. In regard to the comparisons used by the Valuation Office Ms. Moran stated that their first comparison, Castlefin Community Childcare Services, is state funded and does not pay rates. Their second comparison, located in Newtowncunningham, is no longer operational due to economic factors. Respondent’s CaseMr. Tomás Cassidy stated that the subject property is a purpose built two-storey crèche. At inspection it was operating five days per week from7.30 am to 5.30pm and, according to a staff member he spoke to, was catering for 40 to 50 children per day. The property is in good condition throughout and, he understood, was served by a lift. Mr. Cassidy assessed the rateable valuation of the subject property as follows: @ 0.5% €120.12 Mr. Cassidy agreed that both his comparisons (see Appendix 2 hereto) were much smaller than the subject. He agreed that the Newtowncunningham Crèche was closed but it is located in a type of retail development. His second comparison, Castlefin Community Childcare Services, is located in a local community development. Mr. Cassidy stated that there was very limited comparable evidence at the time of valuation. Cross examination Determination
Having regard to the above findings, the Tribunal determines the rateable valuation of the subject property to be €86 calculated as follows: Ground Floor: 457.88 sq. metres @ €28 per sq. metre = €12,820.64 And the Tribunal so determines. |