|
Appeal No. VA98/3/093
AN BINSE LUACHÁLA
VALUATION TRIBUNAL
AN tACHT LUACHÁLA, 1988
VALUATION ACT, 1988
Ballyboden Ltd. APPELLANT
and
Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT
RE: Factory and yard at Map Reference 35Hb,
Drumnasillagh, E.D. Glenties, Co. Donegal
Quantum - Comparisons
B E F O R E
Con Guiney - Barrister at Law Deputy Chairman
Barry Smyth - FRICS.FSCS Member
Finian Brannigan - Solicitor Member
JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL
ISSUED ON THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1999
By Notice of Appeal dated the 5 August 1998, the appellant
appealed against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in
fixing a rateable valuation of £245 on the above described hereditament.
Eight grounds of appeal were set out in a document attached
to the Notice of Appeal.
The appeal proceeded by way of an oral hearing that took
place on the 10th December 1999. Mr. Patrick McCarroll Chartered Valuation
Surveyor, A.R.I.C.S, F.I.A.V.I. A.S.C.S. I.R.R.V., A.C.I. Arb appeared
on behalf of the appellant. Mr. Christopher Hicks, Appeal Valuer appeared
on behalf of the Commissioner of Valuation. Prior to the commencement
of the hearing the parties had exchanged their precis of evidence and
submitted the same to this Tribunal. Mr. McCarroll submitted his pressay
to the Tribunal on the 30th November 1999 and Mr Hicks submitted his pressay
to the Tribunal on the 29th November. Both valuers having taken the oath
adopted their precis as being their evidence in chief. Submissions were
also made. From the evidence so tendered the following emerged as being
the facts relevant and material to and for the purposes of the appeal.
The Property
The premises comprise a two-story building together with single story
factory premises to the rear. The premises are located in the townland
of Drumnasillagh, which is situated c.0.25 miles west of the town of Glenties.
The agreed accommodation is:
Factory area 13,392 sq.ft.
First Flr. offices 2,609 sq.ft.
First Flr. store 1,135 sq.ft.
Ancillary 556 sq.ft.
Old buildings 6,600 sq.ft.
Valuation History
The old premises were last valued in 1984 at RV £37.50. The new
building was constructed in 1996 and a revised valuation of £245
was issued in November 1997. No change was made to the valuation at first
appeal. The appeal to this Tribunal was lodged on 5th August 1998.
Appellant's Valuation Assessment and Comparisons
Mr. McCarroll on behalf of the appellant assessed the rateable valuation
on the subject premises as follows:
Valuation:
Factory 13,392 sq.ft. @ £2.00 = £ 26,784
First floor offices 2,609 sq.ft. @ £1.85 = £ 4,826
First floor Store 1,136 sq.ft. @ £1.00 = £ 1,136
Ancillary 556 sq.ft. @ £ 1.00 £ 556
Total NAV £33,302 @ .5% = £166.50
Plant ( HP and Tanks) = 25 = RV £186
Comparisons:
1. Hubert Plum RV £300
2. Burtonport Fisherman's Co-Op 96/4 - R.V. £165
Full details are attached as Appendix A.
Respondent's Valuation Assessment & Comparisons
Valuation:
Factory including first floor offices 16,000.ft. @ £2.50 = £40,000
First floor ancillary accommodation and stores 1692 sq.ft. @ £1.00
= £ 1,692
Old Factory as rough store 6,600 sq.ft. @ £0.25 = £ 1,650
Total NAV Buildings £43, 342 @ .5% = £216.71
Motive Power 500 hp @ .5p = £25
Yard = £5
Total RV = £246.71 Say 245
Comparisons
1. Galtee Food Products Limited 1989 Revision/Appeal RV £2,075 -
VA93/4/020
2. Polar West Boyle Co Roscommon 1992 Appeal RV £340
Full details are attached as Appendix B.
Tribunal Findings and Determination
Both parties in this appeal have relied on comparisons for the purpose
of assessing the NAV. In relation to the comparisons submitted by the
appellent the Tribunal makes the following comments:
(1) Hubert Plum
Cold room 3959 sq.ft. @ £2.25
This premises is not a finished processing plant but a basic cold store
and is inferior to the subject
(2) Burtonport Fisherman's Co-Op
The chill processing area of 3848 sq.ft. @ £2.25 is used for primary
processing rather than finishing for the shelf processing as in the subject
and therefore we consider it to be inferior to the subject.
In relation to the respondent's comparisons:
(1) Galtee Food Products appears overall to be a far superior premises
to the subject and not particularly relevant in this case.
(2) PolarWest, Boyle is in very similar use in producing
finished products for the shelf as does the subject and as suggested by
the appellant it is not to the same very high standard as required of
the bacon processing plant.
However it is valued at £2.50 a sq.ft. for a larger area than the
subject. We must therefore be guided by this figure of £2.50 per
sq.ft. The most appropriate office comparison is also the premises in
Boyle where on the main offices of 1,602 sq.ft the rate applicable is
£3 and for the prefab offices of 1,820 sq.ft £2.25 is applied.
The NAV on the first floor and ancillary accommodation is agreed between
the valuers at £1.00 per sq.ft. and the horse power is also agreed
at £25. This means the old factory building of 6600 sq.ft. and the
yard remain to be considered.
The old building is clearly put to some use and therefore must have an
NAV and the rate per sq.ft. of .25p proposed seems reasonable. The yard
at 10,000 sq.ft. appears appropriate to the size of premises and should
be included in the overall figure.
We therefore determine the NAV as follows:
The main processing area 13,392 sq.ft @ £2.50 per
sq.ft }
The offices 2,609 sq.ft.@ £2.50 per sq.ft.} = £40,002
The first floor store & ancillary accommodation 1,692sq.ft. @ £1.00
per sq.ft.=£1,692
The old factory 6,600 @ £0.25 per sq.ft. =£1,650
Total NAV £43,344
And applying the fraction of .5% gives an R.V. of £216.72
To which is added the horsepower of £25 =£241.72
say R.V. £240
And the Tribunal so determines.
|