Appeal No. VA94/3/101
AN BINSE LUACHÁLA Pat O'Leary t/a O'Leary's Lissarda APPELLANT RE: Garage at Map Ref: 11Ba.11D/1, Townland: Ballymichael,
B E F O R E JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL By letter of Appeal dated the 2nd day of November 1994 the appellant appealed against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a rateable valuation of £73.00 on the above described hereditament. In his letter of appeal Mr. O'Leary referred to his appeal against revised valuation of £110.00 lodged with the Valuation Office on the 6th day of December 1993, following which an official from the Valuation Office visited the premises in August/September 1994 and agreed to revise the original valuation downward to £95.00. Mr. O'Leary felt that this new figure was excessive relative to his rural location. Mr. O'Leary also stated in his letter of appeal that the property is now subdivided between shop, garage and dwelling house and it is against the rateable valuation of £73.00 on the garage that this appeal lies to the Tribunal. The Property: The accommodation comprises: In addition petrol sales average 2,500 gallons per week. Valuation History: As it transpired, the house and shop were both separately occupied. It was necessary, in accordance with standard valuation practice, to value the house, shop and garage separately. The valuation of £110.00 was amended to: There was a reduction from £110.00 to £95.00 at First Appeal. Written Submissions: A written submission was also received on the 19th day of April 1995 from Mr. Liam Cahill, an Appeal Valuer with the Valuation Office, acting on behalf of the Commissioner of Valuation. In his submission, Mr. Cahill described the location and the property as detailed above and he also set out the valuation history referred to in this judgment. Mr. Cahill set out the breakdown of the rateable valuation of £73.00 in his submission and this is reproduced hereunder: Nett Annual Value and Rateable Value The Nett Annual Value devalues: Car sales yard 10,764 £0.10 1,076 By way of comparative evidence Mr. Cahill referred to four garages within
County Cork i.e. Details of these comparisons are attached to this judgment as Appendix A. Mr. Cahill submitted that the nett annual value and rateable value fixed
at 1993/4 First Appeal had regard to: He also submitted that the rateable value on the subject property is in line with the level of valuations on comparable properties and that it has had regard to the requirements of the 1986 Valuation Act. Oral Hearing: It quickly emerged that the principal difference between the parties was on the question of location. Mr. O'Leary submitted that the first three comparisons offered by the Commissioner were in urban locations, whereas his premises are five miles outside the town of Macroom. Mr. Cahill submitted that his fourth comparison, namely the premises of Denis G. Downey was in a far inferior location to that of the subject premises in that it was not on a main road, whereas the subject premises was on the main Cork to Macroom road. Mr. O'Leary submitted that his premises were disadvantaged in two respects; firstly, the yard was stepped at an angle down towards the road and, secondly, that there was a right of way which restricted his use of access to one of the workshops. Determination: The Tribunal is satisfied that, although located some 5 miles from the town of Macroom, the subject premises is in an excellent location in that it is situate on a busy main thoroughfare. Nett annual value is determined at £13,500, yielding a rateable valuation of £67.50 say £67.00. |