Appeal No. VA96/3/016
AN BINSE LUACHÁLA
VALUATION TRIBUNAL
AN tACHT LUACHÁLA, 1988
VALUATION ACT, 1988
Hugh Boyle, Boyle Entertainment Limited t/a The Seaview
Hotel APPELLANT
and
Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT
RE: Licensed Hotel and Yard at Map Ref: 37Ab, ED: Magheraclogher,
RD: Dunfanaghy, Co. Donegal
Quantum - Percentage of turnover
B E F O R E
Fred Devlin - FRICS.ACI Arb. Deputy Chairman
Mary Devins - Solicitor Deputy Chairman
Marie Connellan - Solicitor Member
JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL
ISSUED ON THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 1997
By Notice of Appeal dated the 15th July, 1996 the appellant appealed
against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a
rateable valuation of £385 on the above described hereditament.
The grounds of appeal as set out in the Notice of Appeal are that:-
"1. The valuation is excessive and inequitable;
2. The valuation is bad in law;
3. No account is taken of the net annual value iBy Notice of Appeal dated
the 15th July, 1996 the appellant appealed against the determination of
the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a rateable valuation of £385
on the above described hereditament.
4. The respondent erred in law in fixing and determining the said valuation
in that he failed to have any or any proper regard to the provisions of
the Valuation Acts and in particular Section 5 of the 1986 Act;
5. The rateable valuation is not assessed in accordance with the relevant
Valuation Acts and related legislation;
6. The valuation is excessive, inequitable and bad in law having regard
to the particular location of the hereditament, the subject matter of
this appeal and the difficulties associated therewith".
This appeal proceeded before the Tribunal by way of an oral hearing held
in the Courthouse, Letterkenny on the 27th day of November, 1996. The
appellant was represented by Mr. Patrick McCarroll, ARICS ASCS, and the
respondent by Mr. Christopher Hicks, a Valuer in the Valuation Office.
The Property:
The property is a family run two storey hotel in the village of Bunbeg
in north west Donegal. This region of Donegal is a popular tourist area
particularly during the peak summer months of July and August. The hotel
is open all the year round and enjoys a steady local custom.
The building is mainly two storey and has been subject to continual alteration
and extension over the past 25 years to its now present state and circumstance.
The agreed external floor area is 21,800 sq.ft. together with stores at
the rear which have an agreed area of 2,680 sq.ft.
Accommodation:
Ground Floor:
Entrance porch
Reception
Dining Room
Restaurant Bar
Lounge
Kitchen
Disco and Male/Female Toilet Accommodation
First Floor:
22 bedrooms four of which are used by the staff.
Turnover:
Turnover for year ending 31st October, 1993 - £779,644 (exc.. VAT)
Turnover for year ending 31st October, 1994 - £800,676 (exc.. VAT)
Gross Profit c. 61%
Oral Hearing:
Having taken the oath each valuer adopted as their evidence in chief their
respective written submissions which had previously been exchanged by
them and submitted to the Tribunal.
Appellant's Contentions:
1. Bunbeg is a small village with a short tourist season and is subject
to intense competition from other hotels in the area.
2. A high percentage of the turnover is achieved during the summer months.
3. The hotel has been extended in a piece-meal fashion over the past 25
years and is built of a variety of materials. The ground floor accommodation
is at different levels. The standard of bedroom accommodation is basic
and the layout at ground floor level is far from ideal.
Respondent's Contentions:
1. The Seaview Hotel is situated in a popular tourist area and benefits
from strong local custom.
2. The hotel is open all year round and has a strong well balanced turnover
as can be seen from an examination of the accounts introduced by the appellant.
One of the main competing hotels (Ostan Gweedore) in the immediate locality
is owned and operated by the same family.
3. The Glenveigh Hotel (Comparison No. 7) is located close-by and was
first valued at 1995/4 revision at a rateable valuation of £500
and has not been subject to an appeal. This hotel has a gross area of
35,000 sq.ft. with 40 bedrooms and a large disco in the basement area.
Mr. McCarroll's Valuation:
Mr. McCarroll valued the subject property on the accounts or profit method
on the basis of the accounts for the year ending 31st October, 1993 and
arrived at a net annual value of £52,802 and a rateable valuation
of £264 of which he attributed £10 to a domestic element.
Mr. McCarroll's valuation is as set out below:-
" Turnover Y/E 31st October, 1993 £779,644
Gross Profit £473,772
Less
Wages £124,782
Overhead Expenses £295,554
Finance interest charges £ 16,230
Depreciation £ 36,434 £473,000
Net Profit £ 772
Add Back
Rent £ 74,638
Rates £ 7,761
Loan Interest £ 16,230
Depreciation £ 36,434
Directors £ 6,317 £141,380
Divisible Balance £142,152
Available for Rent and Rates (50%) £ 71,076
Adjust to 1988 £ 61,409
Rate in £/divider 1.163 £
NAV £ 52,802
RV (0.5%) £264.00 (£10.00 domestic)"
In support of this method of valuation Mr. McCarroll relied upon a statement
contained in the recent Valuation Tribunal decision VA95/1/025 - Ferrycarrig
Castle Hotel Limited v. Commissioner of Valuation which was valued on
an accounts and profit basis "It must be said however, that since
the nature of the operation of a hotel is to achieve profit, it follows
that the rent will be based upon this assumption and hence the most appropriate
method of valuation will be the accounts or profits method".
Mr. McCarroll also carried out a comparative analysis of the subject
hotel with the Bay View Hotel in Killybegs and the Lake of Shadows hotel
in Buncrana as set out in Appendix 1 attaching to this decision.
Mr. Hicks' Valuation:
Mr. Hicks valued the subject property by comparison with several other
hotels in County Donegal as set out in the summary contained in Appendix
2 attached to this decision.
Mr. Hicks' valuation is set out below:
" Seaview Hotel: 21,800 ft2 @ £3.30 = £71,940
Store: 2,680 ft2 @ £1.65 = £ 4,422
NAV = £76,362
@ .5% = £381.81
Say £385
OR
Turnover 1993: = £779,644
To 1988 base (.865) = £674,392
@ 11.36%
NAV = £76,611
@ 0.5% = £383
OR
Rent: = £74,638
Fixed Assets: £299,726 (1993) @ 10% = £29,973
Backdate to 1988 (.865) = £90,489
@ 0.5% = £452"
In response to a question from Mr. Hicks, Mr. McCarroll said that the
rent appearing in the accounts was not a rent in the true sense of the
word but a financial arrangement in order to allow the appellant to obtain
a tax deduction.
In support of this statement, Mr. McCarroll handed in a letter from the
appellant's auditors to this effect.
Mr. McCarroll challenged Mr. Hicks evidence in relation to the Glenveigh
Hotel (Comparison No. 7). This hotel he said had only 10 bedrooms and
not 40 as stated by Mr. Hicks. In response Mr. Hicks said that the Revising
Valuer was unable to carry out a full inspection of this property at revision
but nonetheless he had measured the premises externally and upon this
basis had arrived at his opinion of net annual value. He did not have
any information regarding turnover in this hotel as there was a lack of
co-operation on the owners part. Nonetheless the rateable valuation of
£500 had not been appealed.
Findings:
1. The Seaview Hotel is located in a popular tourist area and enjoys the
business benefits following therefrom together with a steady locally based
custom.
2. The hotel is well managed with a gross profit margin of 61%. An analysis
of the 1993 accounts shows a turnover breakdown as follows:-
Food - 20%
Accommodation - 15%
Beverage Sales - 54%
Disco Admission - 11%
Total - 100%
3. From the above analysis it is clear that the subject possesses many
of the characteristics of a thriving public house and that the accommodation
element represents a relatively small proportion of total turnover. This
is a fact that a hypothetical tenant would take into account in arriving
at an opinion of rental value.
4. Both valuers introduced in evidence the assessments of other hotels
in County Donegal and with the exception of the Glenveigh Hotel made no
submission that their rateable valuations were either incorrect or unfair.
Having regard to Mr. McCarroll's comments in relation to the Glenveigh
Hotel the Tribunal attaches no weight to this comparison. However in arriving
at the net annual value of the subject property the Tribunal must in accordance
with Section 5 of the Valuation Act, 1986 have regard to these assessments
and maintain the levels established by them.
5. Of all the comparisons introduced, the Tribunal considers the Lake
of Shadows Hotel in Buncrana to be the most helpful, in that it too has
a high level of bar trade relative to total turnover. It is also of somewhat
similar size and has the same number of bedrooms. It does not however,
have a disco. Buncrana is of course a much larger town then Bunbeg.
6. Harvey's Point Hotel is of a similar size but it is a new purpose built
hotel aimed at a different segment of the market.
7. Whilst the Tribunal agrees with the principles stated in the Ferrycarrig
decision, the nature of the business in the Seaview Hotel is significantly
different and in this instance the Tribunal is disposed to look at the
findings in the Lake of Shadows Hotel decision VA94/3/019 where a figure
of around 8% was applied to the turnover in order to arrive at a net annual
value of £55,550. Having referred to the nature of the turnover
in the subject premises the Tribunal considers a slightly higher figure
to be appropriate.
8. The Tribunal notes that Mr. McCarroll's opinion of net annual value
is equivalent to 7.8% of Mr. Hicks' adjusted turnover figure of £675,000.
Determination:
Having regard to the above the Tribunal determines the rateable valuation
of the subject premises to be £290.
|