Appeal No. VA95/4/009
AN BINSE LUACHÁLA South Coast Cruisers Limited APPELLANT RE: Licensed House and Stores at Map Ref: 11B, B E F O R E JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL By Notice of Appeal dated the 27th day of September, 1995 the appellant appealed against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a rateable valuation of £55 on the above described hereditament. The grounds of appeal as set out in the Notice of Appeal are that "the valuation determined is a long way above the valuation of similar properties in the area. Complete lack of services. No regard taken of the problems of running a business in a rural area". The Property: Accommodation: There is also a concrete tiled patio and a lower level keg store for the bar. (2) New Block - There is also a kitchen plus toilets/entrance area. Tenure: Written Submissions: Mr. Butler submitted a copy of audited accounts for 1994 the latest which
are available. Mr. Butler said that the subject premises was considerably
disadvantaged by virtue of its location and highlighted the following
factors:- A written submission was received on the 7th March, 1996 from Mr. Terry Dineen, District Valuer in the Valuation Office on behalf of the respondent. In the written submission, Mr. Dineen described the subject premises, he set out its valuation history and dealt with its location in detail. Mr. Dineen said that he had calculated rateable valuation on the subject
premises using three valuation methods, as set out below:- Changing Rooms (gross): 1,095 sq.ft. @ £1.50 = £ 1,642 This figure includes licence, site and car park. RV: @ 0.5% = £56.86 The bar/restaurant could also be valued:- On this method the rateable valuation breaks down:- Valuation Method 2 NAV: @ 8% = £ 6,596 RV: @ 0.5% = £50.00 Increase to 1988 levels + 25% = 25,000 Marlogue Inn Adjusted 1988 Costs: = 120,000 Mr. Dineen said that no direct comparisons were available for the subject property but dealt with the comparisons offered by Mr. Butler. He said that the first comparison, The High Chaparral (RV £22) was in no way comparable to the subject. He said that Murphy's of Garranekinnefeake (now Hartnett) was a substantial property on the waters edge at the other side of the estuary, but that it had not been valued on the rental method of valuation. Mr. Dineen said that the other premises mentioned by Mr. Butler were not recently revised. Oral Hearing: In evidence Mr. Butler stated that the Marlogue Inn licensed premises which forms the major part of the subject hereditament, had to trade at a great disadvantage because of its remote location at East Ferry on Cobh Island. Furthermore, it has to trade without public services such as mains water, sewerage system or refuse collection all of which cost the company considerable monies to provide itself, amounting to approximately £8,000. Being at the end of electricity and telephone lines also means that there are frequent disruption of these services causing loss of business and the continuing of business is also disrupted by tides and flooding of its main access road during monthly high tides. He also stated that the Marlogue Inn is located at a dead-end, 4½ miles by road from the entrance to the Island by Belvelly Bridge and similar distance from Cobh. The licensed premises in Cobh with which the Inn competes are in the centre of a population of 7,000 people and do not have to use taxis, etc which cost his patrons £8 for the round trip from the town. Moreover, he stated that these licensed premises despite their trading advantages pay less rates than the subject and gave comparisons of five premises to confirm the above point. In reply to Mr. Butler, Mr. Dineen stated that the removal of refuse was not a major chore as Mr. Butler's son used the farm tractor to move the refuse to the main collection point. Mr. Dineen also stated that the Marlogue Inn was a very substantial and attractive new premises overlooking the sea and extending to 2,249 square feet gross with lounge bar of 729 square feet which seated approximately 40 patrons and modern restaurant which seated 35 patrons with ancillary kitchen and other service areas, all in excellent decorative order. As a testimony to its style and reputation the Marlogue Inn was featured in the Egon Ronay exclusive Guide Book. Mr. Dineen stated that the very high turnover figures in both the restaurant and bar for the years 1993 and 1994 indicated clearly that the subject premises enjoys very substantial trade even though much of it is done during the summer season. Over the bar there is also an apartment and adjacent to the Inn there is 20,000 square foot of hard-core private parking provided for its patrons. Because of the introduction of the domestic element in the new description, Mr. Dineen stated that Mr. Butler is entitled to qualify for a domestic allowance. However, it is not for the Tribunal to apportion the domestic share of a rateable valuation. Determination:
|